How Germany slid into autocracy and parallels in the U.S.  

The history of the Third Reich cited here comes from the three-volume treatise by Richard J. Evans. I reference these three volumes with roman numerals I, II, and III. The detailed citations are given next.

I: Evans , Richard J. 2003. The coming of the Third Reich. Penguin Books, New York.
II: Evans , Richard J. 2005. The Third Reich in power. Penguin Books, New York.
III: Evans , Richard J. 2008. The Third Reich at war. Penguin Books, New York.  

Germany’s transition from a democratic government to a dictatorship 

 After losing the first world war Germans struggled to rationalize their defeat. Many settled on the idea that the country had been “stabbed in the back” by Jewish powers. A theme Hitler would come back to repeatedly. This resentment coupled with runaway inflation in the early 1920’s, and the depression and mass unemployment in the early 1930’s, left the ruling moderate parties damaged and further polarized left and right wing parties. Below I quote Evans’ concise summary of the appeal of the Nazi party. Although Evans wrote this around 2005 the parallels to the U.S. MAGA movement, ten years later, are eerily similar.

The transition to a dictatorship was also due to “..the Nazi movement itself. Its ideas evidently had a wide appeal to the electorate, or at least were not so outrageous as to put them off. Its dynamism promised a radical cure for the Republic’s ills. Adolf Hitler was a charismatic figure who was able to drum up mass electoral support by the vehemence of his rhetorical denunciations of the unloved Republic, and to convert this into political office, finally, at the right time. ….. The Nazi party was a party of protest, with not much of a positive programme, and few practical solutions, to Germany’s problems. But its extremist ideology, adapted and sometimes veiled according to circumstance and the nature of the particular group of people to whom he was appealing, tapped into a sufficient number of pre-existing German beliefs and prejudices to make it seem to many well worth supporting at the polls. For such people , desperate times called for desperate measures; for many more, particularly in the middle class, the vulgar and uneducated character of the Nazis seemed sufficient guarantee that Hitler’s coalition partners, well educated and well bred, would be able to hold him in check and curb the street violence that seemed such an unfortunate, but no doubt temporary, accompaniment of the movements’ rise to prominence.” (I, pgs. 447-448).